New PDF release: Philo of Alexandria and Post-Aristotelian Philosophy

New PDF release: Philo of Alexandria and Post-Aristotelian Philosophy

By Francesca Alesse

The essays accumulated during this quantity specialise in the function performed via the philosophy of the Hellenistic, or post-Aristotelian age (from the college of the successors of Aristotle, Theophrastus and different Peripatetics, Epicurus, Sceptical Academy and Stoicism, to neo-Pythagorenism and the universities of Antiochus and Eudorus) in Philo of Alexandria's works. regardless of many authoritative reports on Philo's imaginative and prescient of Greek philosophy as an exegetical instrument in allegorizing the Scripture, there's not any such finished assessment in Philo's treatises that takes in account either the growth accomplished within the fresh interpretation of Hellenistic philosophy and research of historical doxographical literature.

Show description

Read Online or Download Philo of Alexandria and Post-Aristotelian Philosophy PDF

Similar eastern books

Charles Goodman's Consequences of Compassion: An Interpretation and Defense of PDF

To many Westerners, the main beautiful teachings of the Buddhist culture pertain to ethics. Many readers have drawn proposal from Buddhism's emphasis on compassion, nonviolence, and tolerance, its crisis for animals, and its versions of advantage and self-cultivation. there was, in spite of the fact that, controversy and confusion approximately which Western moral theories resemble Buddhist perspectives and in what respects.

Read e-book online Seeking the Heart of Wisdom: The Path of Insight Meditation PDF

In looking the center of knowledge Goldstein and Kornfield current the crucial teachings and practices of perception meditation in a transparent and private language. the trail of perception meditation is a trip of figuring out bodies, our minds, and our lives, of seeing sincerely the genuine nature of expertise.

Download e-book for kindle: Early Tibetan documents on Phur pa from Dunhuang by Cathy Cantwell

The precise conditions of the emergence of what are actually referred to as the rNying ma traditions of Tibetan Buddhism stay one of the least sincerely outlined components of Tibetan background for contemporary scholarship. What has made the early historical past of rNying ma tantrism so opaque is the shortage of trustworthy ancient assets.

G.W. Farrow, I Menon's The Concealed Essence of the Hevajra Tantra: With the PDF

The treatise consists of discourses among the Bhagavan Buddha and his disciple Vajragarba, and contains discourses among the Bhagavan and his consort. The Hevajra Tantra, like different Buddhist Sutras and Tantras, commences with the Nidanavakyam--evam maya srutam (Thus have I heard). this is often the resource for the disclose of the Upaya, The potential, the modes of perform.

Additional info for Philo of Alexandria and Post-Aristotelian Philosophy

Sample text

From where, then, did Philo derive this doxographical material? e. more than a century prior to Aëtius. Mansfeld has looked at the epistemology of Philo’s extracts more thoroughly and argues that it may well have a Sceptical or an Academic source. The continual use of the term κατ ληπτος (cf. Somn. 21, 25, 33) points more to the latter. He concludes:44 Two options are open: Philo … either used an Academic source which was based on the Plac. (and such a source would have to be earlier than the 1st cent.

I expect that, if we could ask Philo, he would affirm that the five questions listed above on which the Sophists wrangle can in principle be answered with reference to Scripture. The role of doxography is to help clarify the scope of philosophy and the main issues, and so contributes to the apologetic aim of showing that philosophy based on Scripture can compete at the same level as Greek philosophy. This will become clearer as now turn to more detailed treatment of specific questions that have been prominent in the doxographies studied so far.

Whether he is concerned with the cosmos in any way or not. T. Runia, “Philo’s De aeternitate mundi: the Problem of its Interpretation”, Vigiliae Christianae 35 (1981), 105–151. D. thesis of R. Skarsten (Bergen 1981); cf. K. Fuglseth, “The Reception of Aristotelian Features in Philo and the Authorship Problem of Philo’s De aeternitate mundi” in D. -C. Jacobsen–J. ), Beyond Reception. Mutual Influences between Antique Religion, Judaism, and Early Christianity (Frankfurt am Main 2006), 57–67. In my view this position is not convincing and has not countered the arguments in my philo and hellenistic doxography 35 theme (§§ 1–2), defines the essential terms kosmos and phthora (destruction) (§§ 3–6), and then gives a detailed doxographical overview of opinions on the subject (§§ 7–19).

Download PDF sample

Rated 4.49 of 5 – based on 42 votes
Comments are closed.